Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology.
JCGM 104: Evaluation of Measurement Data - An Introduction to the "Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement" and Related Documents.
Technical Report, JCGM, 2009.


Links:

Abstract:

A statement of measurement uncertainty is indispensable in judging the fitness for purpose of a measured quantity value. At the greengrocery store the customer would be content if, when buying a kilogram of fruit, the scales gave a value within, say, 2 grams of the fruit's actual weight. However, the dimensions of components of the gyroscopes within the inertial navigation systems of commercial aircraft are checked by measurement to parts in a million for correct functioning. Measurement uncertainty is a general concept associated with any measurement and can be used in professional decision processes as well as judging attributes in many domains, both theoretical and experimental. As the tolerances applied in industrial production become more demanding, the role of measurement uncertainty becomes more important when assessing conformity to these tolerances. Measurement uncertainty plays a central role in quality assessment and quality standards. Measurement is present in almost every human activity, including but not limited to industrial, commercial, scientific, healthcare, safety and environmental. Measurement helps the decision process in all these activities. Measurement uncertainty enables users of a measured quantity value to make comparisons, in the context of conformity assessment, to obtain the probability of making an incorrect decision based on the measurement, and to manage the consequential risks. This document serves as an introduction to measurement uncertainty, the GUM and the related documents indicated in the Foreword. A probabilistic basis for uncertainty evaluation is used. Annex A gives acronyms and initialisms used in this document. In future editions of JCGM 200 (VIM) it is intended to make a clear distinction between the use of the term error as a quantity and as a quantity value. The same statement applies to the term indication. In the current document such a distinction is made. JCGM 200:2008 does not distinguish explicitly between these uses.

Bibtex:

@TechReport{     jcgm:2009:IGEU,
  author = 	 {Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology},
  title = 	 {JCGM 104: Evaluation of Measurement Data - An
                  Introduction to the "Guide to the Expression of
                  Uncertainty in Measurement" and Related Documents},
  institution =  {JCGM},
  year = 	 {2009},
}

Images:

References:

[1] Bell, S. Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 11. A Beginner's Guide to Uncertainty of Measurement. Tech.
of the least-squares method. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 107, in preparation. 1, 9.1
[4] BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML. Evaluation of measurement data | Concepts and basic principles. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 105, in preparation. 1, 4.1
[5] BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML. Evaluation of measurement data | Supplement 2 to the \Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" | Models with any number of output quantities. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 102, in preparation. 1, 6.1, 7.5.2
[6] BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML. Evaluation of measurement data | Supplement 3 to the \Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" | Modelling. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 103, in preparation. 1, 6.1, 6.2
[7] BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML. Evaluation of measurement data | The role of measurement uncertainty in conformity assessment. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 106, in preparation. 1, 8.1
[8] Casella, G. C., and Berger, R. L. Statistical Inference. Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove, 2001. Second Edition. 7.3.1
[9] Cox, M. G. The evaluation of key comparison data. Metrologia 39 (2002), 589{595. 9.4
[10] Cox, M. G., and Harris, P. M. SSfM Best Practice Guide No. 6, Uncertainty evaluation. Tech. Rep. DEM-ES-011, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK, 2006. 7.3.1, 7.3.2
[11] Cox, M. G., and Harris, P. M. Software specifications for uncertainty evaluation. Tech. Rep. DEM-ES-010, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK, 2006.
[12] Dietrich, C. F. Uncertainty, Calibration and Probability. Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK, 1991. 7.3.1
[13] Elster, C. Calculation of uncertainty in the presence of prior knowledge. Metrologia 44 (2007), 111{116. 3.20
[14] EURACHEM/CITAC. Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. Tech. Rep. Guide CG4, EU-RACHEM/CITEC,[EURACHEM/CITAC Guide], 2000. Second edition.
[15] Feller, W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Volume I. Wiley, 1968.
[16] Feller, W. An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Volume II. Wiley, 1971.
[17] Hibbert, D. B. Quality Assurance for the Analytical Chemistry Laboratory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007.
[18] IEC. IEC Guide 115. Application of uncertainty of measurement to conformity assessment activities in the electrotechnical sector. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. 8.1
[19] ISO. ISO 10576-1. Statistical methods | Guidelines for the evaluation of conformity with specified requirements | Part 1: General principles, 2003. International Standards Organization, Geneva. 8.5
[20] ISO/IEC. ISO/IEC 17025. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories, 2005. International Standards Organization, Geneva.
[21] Korczynski, M. J., Cox, M. G., and Harris, P. M. Convolution and uncertainty evaluation. In Advanced Mathematical Tools in Metrology VII (Singapore, 2006), P. Ciarlini, E. Felipe, A. B. Forbes, and F. Pavese, Eds., World Scientific, pp. 188{195. 9.4
[22] Mohr, P. J., and Taylor, B. N. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2002. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76 (2004), 4. 9.4
[23] NIST. Uncertainty of measurement results.
[24] Possolo, A., and Toman, B. Assessment of measurement uncertainty via observation equations. Metrologia 44 (2007), 464{475. 3.20
[25] Rice, J. R. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis, second ed. Duxbury Press, Belmont, Ca., USA, 1995. 7.3.2
[26] Weise, K., and Woger, W. A Bayesian theory of measurement uncertainty. Meas. Sci. Technol. 3 (1992), 1-11.4.8