Designed especially for neurobiologists, FluoRender is an interactive tool for multi-channel fluorescence microscopy data visualization and analysis.
Deep brain stimulation
BrainStimulator is a set of networks that are used in SCIRun to perform simulations of brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and magnetic transcranial stimulation (TMS).
Developing software tools for science has always been a central vision of the SCI Institute.

SCI Publications

2010


E.B. Dam, P.T. Fletcher, S.M. Pizer. “Automatic shape model building based on principal geodesic analysis bootstrapping,” In Medical Image Analysis, Vol. 12, No. 2, Note: Epub Feb 2 2010, pp. 136--151. 2010.
PubMed ID: 18178124



J. Daniels, E.W. Anderson, L.G. Nonato, C.T. Silva. “Interactive Vector Field Feature Identification,” In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Visualization Conference, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 1560--1568. 2010.
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.170
PubMed ID: 20975198



B.C. Davis, P.T. Fletcher, E. Bullitt, S. Joshi. “Population Shape Regression from Random Design Data,” In International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 90, No. 1, Note: Marr Prize Special Issue, pp. 255--266. October, 2010.
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408977



N.J. Drury, B.J. Ellis, J.A. Weiss, P.J. McMahon, R.E. Debski. “The impact of glenoid labrum thickness and modulus on labrum and glenohumeral capsule function,” In Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 12, Note: Awarded 2010 Skalak Best Paper!, pp. 121003--121010. 2010.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4002622



S. Durrleman, X. Pennec, A. Trouvé, N. Ayache, J. Braga. “Comparison of the endocast growth of chimpanzees and bonobos via temporal regression and spatiotemporal registration,” In Proceedings of the MICCAI Workshop on Spatio-Temporal Image Analysis for Longitudinal and Time-Series Image Data, Beijing, China, pp. (in press). September, 2010.



S. Durrleman, P. Fillard, X. Pennec, A. Trouvé, N. Ayache. “Registration, Atlas Estimation and Variability Analysis of White Matter Fiber Bundles Modeled as Currents,” In NeuroImage, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 1073--1090. 2010.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.056



M. El-Sayed, R.G. Steen, M.D. Poe, T.C. Bethea, G. Gerig, J. Lieberman, L. Sikich. “Deficits in gray matter volume in psychotic youth with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders are not evident in psychotic youth with mood disorders,” In J Psychiatry Neurosci, July, 2010.



M. El-Sayed, R.G. Steen, M.D. Poe, T.C. Bethea, G. Gerig, J. Lieberman, L. Sikich. “Brain volumes in psychotic youth with schizophrenia and mood disorders,” In Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 229--236. July, 2010.
PubMed ID: 20569649



T. Etiene, L.G. Nonato, C.E. Scheidegger, J. Tierny, T.J. Peters, V. Pascucci, R.M. Kirby, C.T. Silva. “Topology Verification for Isosurface Extraction,” SCI Technical Report, No. UUSCI-2010-003, SCI Institute, University of Utah, 2010.



P.T. Fletcher, R.T. Whitaker, R. Tao, M.B. DuBray, A. Froehlich, C. Ravichandran, A.L. Alexander, E.D. Bigler, N. Lange, J.E. Lainhart. “Microstructural connectivity of the arcuate fasciculus in adolescents with high-functioning autism,” In NeuroImage, Vol. 51, No. 3, Note: Epub Feb 2 2010, pp. 1117--1125. July, 2010.
PubMed ID: 20132894



T. Fogal, J. Krüger. “Tuvok, an Architecture for Large Scale Volume Rendering,” In Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Vision, Modeling, and Visualization, pp. 139--146. November, 2010.
DOI: 10.2312/PE/VMV/VMV10/139-146



T. Fogal, H. Childs, S. Shankar, J. Krüger, R.D. Bergeron, P. Hatcher. “Large Data Visualization on Distributed Memory Multi-GPU Clusters,” In Proceedings of High Performance Graphics 2010, pp. 57--66. 2010.



S.E. Geneser, J.D. Hinkle, R.M. Kirby, Brian Wang, B. Salter, S. Joshi. “Quantifying Variability in Radiation Dose Due to Respiratory-Induced Tumor Motion,” In Medical Image Analysis, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 640--649. 2010.
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2010.07.003



S. Gerber, T. Tasdizen, P.T. Fletcher, S. Joshi, R.T. Whitaker, the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). “Manifold modeling for brain population analysis,” In Medical Image Analysis, Special Issue on the 12th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2009, Vol. 14, No. 5, Note: Awarded MICCAI 2010, Best of the Journal Issue Award, pp. 643--653. 2010.
ISSN: 1361-8415
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2010.05.008
PubMed ID: 20579930



S. Gerber, P.-T. Bremer, V. Pascucci, R.T. Whitaker. “Visual Exploration of High Dimensional Scalar Functions,” In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Vol. 16, No. 6, IEEE, pp. 1271--1280. Nov, 2010.
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.213
PubMed ID: 20975167
PubMed Central ID: PMC3099238



J.H. Gilmore, C. Kang, D.D. Evans, H.M. Wolfe, M.D. Smith, J.A. Lieberman, W. Lin, R.M. Hamer, M. Styner, G. Gerig. “Prenatal and Neonatal Brain Structure and White Matter Maturation in Children at High Risk for Schizophrenia,” In American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 167, No. 9, Note: Epub 2010 Jun 1, pp. 1083--1091. September, 2010.
PubMed ID: 20516153



J.H. Gilmore, J.E. Schmitt, R.C. Knickmeyer, J.K. Smith, W. Lin, M. Styner, G. Gerig, M.C. Neale. “Genetic and environmental contributions to neonatal brain structure: A twin study,” In Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 31, No. 8, Note: ePub 8 Jan 2010, pp. 1174--1182. 2010.
PubMed ID: 20063301



K. Gorczowski, M. Styner, J.Y. Jeong, J.S. Marron, J. Piven, H.C. Hazlett, S.M. Pizer, G. Gerig. “Multi-object analysis of volume, pose, and shape using statistical discrimination,” In IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell., Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 652--661. April, 2010.
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2009.92
PubMed ID: 20224121



M. Grabherr, P. Russell, M.D. Meyer, E. Mauceli, J. Alföldi, F. Di Palma, K. Lindblad-Toh. “Genome-wide synteny through highly sensitive sequence alignment: Satsuma,” In Bioinformatics, Vol. 26, No. 9, pp. 1145--1151. 2010.

ABSTRACT

Motivation: Comparative genomics heavily relies on alignments of large and often complex DNA sequences. From an engineering perspective, the problem here is to provide maximum sensitivity (to find all there is to find), specificity (to only find real homology) and speed (to accommodate the billions of base pairs of vertebrate genomes).

Results: Satsuma addresses all three issues through novel strategies: (i) cross-correlation, implemented via fast Fourier transform; (ii) a match scoring scheme that eliminates almost all false hits; and (iii) an asynchronous 'battleship'-like search that allows for aligning two entire fish genomes (470 and 217 Mb) in 120 CPU hours using 15 processors on a single machine.

Availability: Satsuma is part of the Spines software package, implemented in C++ on Linux. The latest version of Spines can be freely downloaded under the LGPL license from http://www.broadinstitute.org/science/programs/genome-biology/spines/ Contact: grabherr@broadinstitute.org



X. Guo, J. Li, D. Xiu, A. Alexeenko. “Uncertainty Quantification Models for Microscale Squeeze-Film Damping,” In International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 84, No. 10, pp. 1257--1272. 2010.
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2952

ABSTRACT

Two squeeze-film gas damping models are proposed to quantify uncertainties associated with the gap size and the ambient pressure. Modeling of gas damping has become a subject of increased interest in recent years due to its importance in micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS). In addition to the need for gas damping models for design of MEMS with movable micro-structures, knowledge of parameter dependence in gas damping contributes to the understanding of device-level reliability. In this work, two damping models quantifying the uncertainty in parameters are generated based on rarefied flow simulations. One is a generalized polynomial chaos (gPC) model, which is a general strategy for uncertainty quantification, and the other is a compact model developed specifically for this problem in an early work. Convergence and statistical analysis have been conducted to verify both models. By taking the gap size and ambient pressure as random fields with known probability distribution functions (PDF), the output PDF for the damping coefficient can be obtained. The first four central moments are used in comparisons of the resulting non-parametric distributions. A good agreement has been found, within 1\%, for the relative difference for damping coefficient mean values. In study of geometric uncertainty, it is found that the average damping coefficient can deviate up to 13% from the damping coefficient corresponding to the average gap size. The difference is significant at the nonlinear region where the flow is in slip or transitional rarefied regimes.

Keywords: uncertainty quantification, squeeze-film damping, gPC expansion, rarefied flow